Legal Opinion

Lickert v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1944No. 31606PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

In this action the plaintiffs, as members of the police force of the city of Omaha, sought a declaratory judgment declaring their rights, duties and liabilities under the. pension provisions of the Omaha city charter, a declaration that a charter amendment was unconstitutional and void and for other relief. The trial court entered a judgment declaring the status of plaintiffs under the charter provisions. From that judgment the defendants appealed. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.

In 1921 the Legislature adopted “An act to incorporate Metropolitan cities, and pertaining to the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Dodge v. Board of Ed. of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. City of Dallas v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Fox v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. SCHULL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. KoenigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Calabro v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Gossman v. State Employees Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Wilson v. MarshNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API