Legal Opinion

Calabro v. City of Omaha

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1995No. S-93-566PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Certain current and retired firefighters (the plaintiffs) filed this class action seeking a declaration of their rights under a supplemental cost-of-living benefit provided by the City of Omaha, which the city eliminated in 1989. The plaintiffs’ claims raise two threshold issues: (1) Did the supplemental cost of living benefit constitute a pension? and, if so, (2) When did the plaintiffs’ constitutionally protected contract right in the pension vest? The district court for Douglas County granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, holding that the city violated the federal…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Felder v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Baltimore Teachers Union v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Sanitary & Improvement District 57 v. City of ElkhornNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Shepherd v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Shearer v. LeuenbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Spear T Ranch, Inc. v. KnaubNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API