Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Marsh

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1956No. 33924PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.

The object of this litigation is to secure an adjudication that seven designated judges of the district court of Nebraska, each of whom are or will be more than 70 years of age on January 3, 1957, are ineligible to be candidates for, to be elected to, or to hold the office of judge of the district court for the term beginning on that date and to enjoin the Secretary of State from certifying the names of said persons to any election official as candidates for the office of district judge.

Plaintiffs allege that: They are residents of the State of Nebraska and are electors and taxpayers in the…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Diamond Glue Co. v. United States Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Matter of Mahon v. . Bd. of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  5. Nelsen v. TilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Meyer v. County of LancasterNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gossman v. State Employees Retirement SystemNebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Chase v. County of DouglasNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Metropolitan Utilities District v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Public Employees Retirement BoardNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API