Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Trammell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1937No. 7163PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge German

delivered the opinion for the Court.

In this case the one dominant question is the constitutionality of what is known as H. B. 122, enacted by the 44th Legislature of the State of Texas, being Article 6243a of Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes, in so far as it attempts to reduce the amount payable to defendant in error, C. W. Trammell, as a monthly pension. Defendant in error, on September 18, 1935, retired from the police department of the City of Dallas, after twenty years of continuous service. Prior to 1933, the City of Dallas adopted the provisions for the creation of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pennie v. ReisSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Byrd v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  3. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Risch v. Board of Trustees of the Policemen's Pension FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People Ex Rel. Donovan v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. Ex Parte AbellTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Klumb v. Houston Municipal Employees Pension SystemTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Commission of Appeals · 1943
  4. Honors Acad., Inc. v. Tex. Educ. AgencyTexas Supreme Court · 2018
  5. McGuire v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1943

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API