Legal Opinion
Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District v. Hutcheon
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1956No. Civ. 8999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
J. — The Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District seeks a writ of mandate to compel Colin C. Hutcheon, the district clerk, to publish and mail a notice of sale of certain bonds as provided in a resolution of the board of directors of the sewer district. The facts are set forth in an agreed statement. The application was filed with the Supreme Court and was transferred to this court.
The Fairfield-Suisun Sewer District was created by a special act of the Legislature (Stats. 1951, ch. 303) and was duly organized. Bonds in the amount of $1,060,000 were approved by the voters on November 2, 1954, by a vote…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- In Re City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Rideout v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. SpinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Payne v. KirkpatrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- City of Saratoga v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2019