Legal Opinion
Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Spink
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1956No. Civ. 9050PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.
This is an original proceeding instituted by the Sacramento Municipal Utility District to compel Joseph E. Spink, as secretary of the Sacramento Municipal Utility District, to sign and execute some $85,000,000 worth of bonds which were authorized by the electors of the district.
The Sacramento Municipal Utility District was organized in July of 1923 under the provisions of the Municipal Utility District Act (now Pub. Util. Code, div. 6, §11501 et seq.). The district serves a population in excess of 300,000 and comprises an area of approximately 650 square miles in Sacramento and Placer…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Abeel v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Heron v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Gillum v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Board of Education v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Corona Unified Hospital District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Wright v. Compton Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. City of ArtesiaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Kahn v. East Bay Municipal Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.