Rideout v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.
The two above-entitled eases are taxpayers’ actions in the nature of equity proceedings to annul two special municipal elections held in the city of Los Angeles on June 3, 1919, and practically take the form of election contests. (Gibson v. Board of Supervisors, 80 Cal. 359, [22 Pac. 225].) Being identical in nature and in points raised, the two cases were consolidated for trial. The present appeals are taken by plaintiff from judgments in favor of defendants.
At the special election attacked in the first above-entitled case, the question submitted to the voters involved the authorization of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Parvin v. WimbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Russell v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Simpson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Canales v. City of AlvisoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Estate of BernardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Barsha v. Metro-Goldwyn-MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Davis v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.