Legal Opinion

Payne v. Kirkpatrick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 1984No. WD 36365PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

This is an action in mandamus seeking to compel the Missouri Secretary of State to place, for popular vote, a proposed constitutional amendment on the ballot for November 6, 1984, which, if approved, would permit and allow pari-mutuel wagering on horse racing. The circuit court, by its judgment in the form of an order, directed the Missouri Secretary of State to in turn direct local election authorities to place the proposal on the ballot for the November 6, 1984 general election. An appeal from that judgment was presented to this court. The judgment is affirmed.

While at the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney General v. VailSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. State v. BurnauSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  3. McGary v. BarrowsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  4. State Ex Rel. Donnell v. OsbornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  5. Yes to Stop Callaway Committee v. KirkpatrickMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Missourians to Protect the Initiative Process v. BluntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  2. David Harris v. Missouri Court Of Appeals, Western DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Harris v. Missouri Gaming CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  4. Jim Boeving, Patty Arrowood, Robert E. Pund, and Robert A. Klein v. Missouri Secretary of State Jason Kander, Raise Your Hand for Kids, and Erin BrowerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. Knight v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API