Legal Opinion
City of Park City v. Rural Water District No. 2, Sedgwick County
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided April 16, 1997No. Civil Action 97-1054-FGTPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the plaintiffs motion to remand, Doe. 8. Plaintiff filed this action in the Eighteenth Judicial District, District Court of Sedgwick County, Kansas, seeking declaratory and other relief under K.S.A. 12-527. That statute provides the procedure, once land located within a rural water district has been annexed by a municipality, for the municipality to purchase the facilities owned by the rural water district and used for the transportation and distribution of water within the annexed area. Upon the defendant’s failure…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Schmeling v. NordamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- City Of Madison, Mississippi v. Bear Creek Water Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- City of Grand Junction v. Ute Water Conservancy DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Glenpool Utility Services Authority v. Creek County Rural Water District No. 2Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bellido-Sullivan v. American International Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Public Water Supply District No. 8 Of Clay County, Missouri v. City Of Kearney, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Public Water Supply District No. 8 of Clay County v. City of KearneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Adamson v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
- Graves v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025