Legal Opinion

Adamson v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 2025No. 4:21-cv-00047Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA RICHARD ADAMSON, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-CV-047-JFH-CDL UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, et al., Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is the Motion to Remand (“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Richard Adamson. Dkt. No. 16. Defendants filed a Response in Opposition. Dkt. No. 20. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was employed by Union Pacific for almost fifteen (15) years prior to his termination. Id. at ¶¶ 7-8. Plaintiff was a collective bargaining unit employee and represented by a union. Id. at ¶ 10. Defendants contend Union Pacific is a rail…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API