Legal Opinion
Public Water Supply District No. 8 of Clay County v. City of Kearney
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2005No. 04-2072PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
The controversy underlying this appeal is a dispute over whether Public Water Supply District Number 8 or the City of Kearney will supply water to certain property owners in Missouri. But we need not reach the merits of this dispute to resolve the appeal because we conclude that the case is not ripe. We therefore remand the case to the district court for entry of a judgment dismissing the case without prejudice.
The District is a political subdivision of the State of Missouri charged with providing water to people who reside within the geographical…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Armbruster v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Public Water Supply District No. 8 Of Clay County, Missouri v. City Of Kearney, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005