Legal Opinion

Graves v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 2025No. 4:21-cv-00046Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA BILLY JACK GRAVES, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-CV-046-JFH-JFJ UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD, et al., Defendants. ORDER Before the Court is the Motion to Remand (“Motion”) filed by Plaintiff Billy Jack Graves (“Plaintiff”). Dkt. No. 14. Defendants Union Pacific Railroad, Lloyd Plymale and Kelly Smith (collectively, “Defendants”) filed a Response in Opposition. Dkt. No. 20. BACKGROUND Plaintiff was employed by Union Pacific for almost fifteen (15) years. Dkt. No. 2-1 at ¶ 8. Plaintiff was a collective bargaining unit employee and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Lingle v. Norge Division of Magic Chef, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Beneficial National Bank v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API