Legal Opinion
Schmeling v. Nordam
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 4, 1996No. 95-5184PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENGEL, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Curtis Schmeling appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant NORDAM, a corporation, in Sehmeling’s suit following the termination of his employment with NORDAM. NORDAM is an air repair station, certified by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), that contracts with commercial airlines to manufacture and perform maintenance work on aircraft parts. Schmeling sued in Oklahoma state court, and NORDAM removed the case to federal district court. Because we conclude that federal courts do not have subject-matter jurisdiction over Schmeling’s…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Karen Hansen v. Group Health CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Smart v. Local 702 International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Andrews v. HeatonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Devon Energy Production Co. v. Mosiac Potash Carlsbad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Blab T v. of Mobile, Inc. v. Comcast Cable Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.