Legal Opinion

City of Grand Junction v. Ute Water Conservancy District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 30, 1995No. 93SC745PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

The issues in this case arise out of a dispute between the Ute Water Conservancy District (District) and the City of Grand Junction (City) as to which entity has the authority to provide water to domestic water users in areas where the boundaries of the City and the District overlap. The primary issue in this case is whether a bond — originally issued by the District to the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA), an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture, and subsequently reacquired by the District — satisfies the outstanding debt requirement of the applicable federal statute, 7…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
  2. Sequoyah County Rural Water District No. 7 v. Town of MuldrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. Colorado Department of Revenue v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. Sky Fun 1 v. SchuttloffelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Osband v. United Airlines, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API