Legal Opinion
Bevill v. Zoura
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 1994No. D018832PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, J.
Landlord S. James Bevill prevailed in an unlawful detainer action against his tenant Latif Zoura. Zoura appeals, asserting defects in the three-day notice to pay rent or quit. We reverse the judgment.
Factual Background
In August 1989, Bevill, the owner of a Chula Vista shopping center, entered into a commercial lease agreement with Zoura. On November 25, 1992, Bevill served Zoura with a three-day notice to pay rent or quit. The three-day notice stated that Zoura owed $40,033.28 in rent and common area maintenance charges from April 1991 through November 1992. The notice…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Kwok v. BergrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Cal-American Income Property Fund IV v. HoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Nourafchan v. MinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sargent Fletcher, Inc. v. Able Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Losornio v. MottaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Levitz Furniture Co. of the Pac., Inc. v. Wingtip Commc'ns, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Advantec Group, Inc. v. Edwin's Plumbing Co.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bawa v. TerhuneCalifornia Superior Court · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.