Legal Opinion

Bawa v. Terhune

California Superior Court

Decided January 30, 2019No. BV 032618PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRicciardulli, J.

INTRODUCTION

We hold that, when a landlord returns a tenant's rent check without cashing it based on a de minimis shortage in the agreed-upon rent, a tenant can assert the landlord's bad faith in rejecting the payment as a defense to an unlawful detainer action. We reject appellant's argument that when, as in the present case, a check is returned because it is one cent short and an eviction notice is served days later, the tenant must re-tender payment following service of the notice and has no defense to the action after failure to re-tender.

The jury in the unlawful detainer action brought by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & ConverseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ceja v. Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. v. WilkoskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. 65282 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  2. Alonso v. HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  3. Colonial Manor, Inc. v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. Colonial Manor, Inc. v. ReyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
  5. Frazier v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API