Legal Opinion
Nourafchan v. Miner
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1985No. B006018PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
Defendant James P. Miner appeals from the adverse judgment in this unlawful detainer action for failure to pay rent after service of a three-day notice to pay or quit. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1161.) After unsuccessfully seeking a stay of execution pending appeal, defendant was evicted from his penthouse apartment. The issues raised on appeal are (1) the validity of service of the three-day notice by posting and mailing (Code Civ. Proc., § 1162, subd. 3), and (2) whether the past payments of rent in excess of the rent ceiling imposed by the Santa Monica Rent Control Law…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Palermo v. Stockton Theatres, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Tevis v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Highland Plastics, Inc. v. EndersAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1980
- Ernst Enterprises Inc. v. Sun Valley Gasoline, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bevill v. ZouraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Lynch & Freytag v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Minelian v. ManzellaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Palm Property Investments, LLC v. YadegarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Sego v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.