Legal Opinion
Losornio v. Motta
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 2, 1998No. D031345PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McINTYRE, J.
This case was certified to this court by the Appellate Department of the Superior Court of San Diego County and we transferred it here for the purpose of settling an important question of law: Whether Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 1013 applies to extend the notice periods required before a tenancy may be terminated and an unlawful detainer action initiated. We conclude that the service and notice provisions in the unlawful detainer statutes and section 1013 are mutually exclusive, and thus, section 1013 does not extend the notice periods that are a prerequisite to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Schubert v. LoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Bevill v. ZouraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Kwok v. BergrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Woods-Drury, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Liebovich v. ShahrokhkhanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Birkner v. LamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Palm Property Investments, LLC v. YadegarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Mitchell Land & Improvement Co. v. Ristorante Ferrantelli, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- MITCHELL LAND AND IMPROVEMENT CO. v. Ristorante Ferrantelli, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Bank of New York Mellon v. PreciadoAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.