State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
Petitioner State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) seeks a writ of mandate to vacate the order of respondent superior court excluding all evidence of State Farm’s advice of counsel defense to a claim of insurance bad faith alleged by real parties in interest Johnson Kinsey, Inc., Edward Allen Wenz, Jr., Mary L. Johnson, Paul Kinsey, James M. Johnson, Blake Bowen, and Dorothy Haight (collectively Johnson Kinsey). The court excluded the evidence on the ground State Farm had failed to specifically plead advice of counsel in its answer and thus Johnson…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mock v. Michigan Millers Mutual InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Dalrymple v. United Services Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Walsh v. West Valley Mission Cmty. Coll. Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Alpha Mechanical, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.