Legal Opinion

Pressly v. Walker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1953No. 524PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, C. J.

It is a familiar rule that pleadings are to be given liberal construction in favor of the pleader, and that a complaint may not be overthrown by a demurrer unless it be fatally defective. Hollifield v. Everhart, 237 N.C. 313, 74 S.E. 2d 706; Bumgardner v. Fence Co., 236 N.C. 698, 74 S.E. 2d 32; Blackmore v. Winders, 144 N.C. 212, 56 S.E. 874.

A demurrer admits the truth of all relevant facts well pleaded but does not admit conclusions of law asserted by the pleader. McKinney v. High Point, 237 N.C. 66, 74 S.E. 2d 440; Mills Co. v. Shaw, 233 N.C. 71, 62 S.E. 2d 487.

It is alleged that Dr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blackmore v. . WindersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Ely v. New Mexico & Arizona RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. McKinney v. City of High PointSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Satterwhite v. . GallagherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Bumgardner v. Allison Fence Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hayes v. RicardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Don Allen Chevrolet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Daniel v. WrayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Kindley v. PrivetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Adams v. Flora MacDonald CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API