Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Ricard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1956No. 238PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

At the outset it is necessary to determine whether this action is simply to remove cloud upon title or whether it is a suit in ejectment. The nature of the action is not determined by what either party calls it, but by the issues arising on the pleadings and by the relief sought.

The plaintiffs alleged they are owners and entitled to possession of the land in controversy; that the defendant claims under a void conveyance; and that she is in wrongful possession and is unlawfully receiving the rents and profits. They asked that they be declared to be the owners; that the defendant’s conveyance…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Prevatt v. Harrelson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Satterwhite v. . GallagherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Phillips v. Interstate Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Fowler v. ValencourtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Mims v. MimsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API