Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Wray

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 3, 2003No. COA02-768PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUNTER, Judge.

Defendants appeal an order denying their motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for failure to allege registration of an assumed name certificate in their original complaint, as well as failure to join a real party in interest in this action. Further, defendants appeal an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, which resulted in plaintiffs being declared the true “St. Andrew’s Episcopal Church of Morehead City” and the rightful owners of all the parish’s real and personal property. We affirm the trial court’s decision with respect to both motions; however, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bruce-Terminix Company v. Zurich Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Purcell v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  3. Falk Integrated Technologies, Inc. v. StackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Dulin Ex Rel. Dulin v. FairesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Episcopal Church CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Jones v. MilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Heartland Presbytery v. Gashland Presbyterian ChurchMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. High Rock Lake Partners, LLC v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Am. Oil Co., Inc. v. Aan Real Estate, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API