Legal Opinion

Bumgardner v. Allison Fence Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1953No. 307PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

We treat tbe appeals of appellants in the order of their names:

Appeal of Allison Fence Company and Robert H. George.

The demurrer of these defendants brings into focus the allegations of plaintiff’s complaint and raises the question as to whether or not the facts alleged are sufficient to constitute a cause of action against them. For this purpose the truth of the allegations contained therein is admitted, and “ordinarily relevant inferences of fact necessarily deducible therefrom are also admitted. But the principle does not extend to admissions of conclusions or inferences of law,” Stacy, C.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. Hinnant v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. State v. . GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Herman v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Maola Ice Cream Co. v. Maola Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. Merrimack Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Shives v. SampleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Lamm v. CrumplerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Pressly v. WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API