Legal Opinion
Kindley v. Privette
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 24, 1954No. 388PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The demurrer tests the sufficiency of the complaint. The rules applicable in so testing the complaint have been often stated and are well settled. Pressly v. Walker, 238 N.C. 732, 78 S.E. 2d 920, and cases cited. The complaint must be fatally defective. If any portion of it alleges facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, the complaint will stand. Cummings v. Dunning, 210 N.C. 156, 185 S.E. 653. This explains, in part, why we have not undertaken to include all allegations of the complaint in the above statement of facts.
The complaint, apart from other allegations, alleges that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Flake Ex Rel. Flake v. Greensboro News Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Osborn v. Leach.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Brown v. Elm City Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Pentuff v. . ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Pentuff v. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Arnold v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Badame v. LampkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Stewart v. Nation-Wide Check CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- RH Bouligny, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of Amer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Sunbeam Tel. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.