Legal Opinion

McKinney v. City of High Point

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 30, 1953No. 667PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

On the demurrer we take the case as made by the amended complaint. The office of a demurrer is to test the sufficiency of a pleading, admitting, for the purpose, the truth of factual averments well stated and such relevant inferences as may be deduced therefrom, but it does not admit any legal inferences or conclusions of law asserted by the pleader. "We are required on a demurrer to construe the complaint liberally with a view to substantial justice between the parties, and every reasonable intendment is to be made in favor of the pleader. G-.S. 1-151; Barber v. Wooten, 234 N.C. 107, 66 S.E.…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Fawcett v. Town of Mt. AirySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Leathers v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. McIlhenney v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Midgett v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. City of Scottsdale v. Municipal Court of TempeArizona Supreme Court · 1962

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API