Legal Opinion

Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency v. Boyne

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 28, 1998No. C5-96-2325PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILBERT, Justice.

This case raises the issue of whether appellant Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency (SMMPA), a municipal power agency incorporated pursuant to Minn.Stat. *363§§ 453.51-62 (1996), is subject to the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minn.Stat. § 471.705 (1996), and the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 13.01-99 (1996). SMMPA contends it is not subject to either the Open Meeting Law or the Data Practices Act because the legislature granted it the authority to conduct its affairs as a private corporation, which includes the authority to hold closed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Olson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Doe v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. State v. ZacherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Lahr v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Heine v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device PermitsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API