Legal Opinion
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds View
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 3, 2003No. C0-01-1695, C5-01-1708PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BLATZ, Chief Justice.
Appellant Minnesota Department of Transportation denied Respondent Eller Media Company’s application for six permits to construct revenue-generating billboards on a municipally owned golf course in the City of Mounds View. The denial was based on a determination that the locations requested were not suitable under the Minnesota Outdoor Advertising Control Act. Following a contested cáse hearing, an administrative law judge reversed that determination and recommended issuance of the permits. Pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 14.63 (2002), the Minnesota Department of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- McEwen v. Tennessee Department of SafetyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- In Re the Cities of Annandale & Maple Lake NPDES/SDS Permit Issuance for the Discharge of Treated WastewaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- 500, LLC v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.