Legal Opinion

Do v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 2010No. A07-1461PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Justice.

Appellant Dean Do brought an action against his automobile insurer, respondent American Family Mutual Insurance Company (American Family), seeking no-fault medical expense benefits related to a motor vehicle accident. Following a jury verdict awarding Do damages from American Family, the district court reduced the award, concluding that a settlement pay*855ment Do received from the at-fault driver’s automobile insurer is a “collateral source” that should be deducted from the jury award under Minnesota’s collateral source statute, Minn.Stat. § 548.251 (2008).1 The court of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoang Minh Ly v. NystromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Imlay v. City of Lake CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Hueper v. GoodrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Milbrandt v. American Legion Post of MoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Staab v. Diocese of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Swanson v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Angela Mary Lennartson, Katie FossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  4. Steven J. Jaeger v. Palladium Holdings, LLC, Franklin Financial, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Graff v. Robert M. Swendra Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API