Legal Opinion
In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 23, 2002No. C0-01-1695, C5-01-1708PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
R.A. RANDALL, Judge.
In these consolidated zoning disputes, relators Eller Media Company (“Eller Media”) and the City of Mounds View (“city”) seek review of respondent Minnesota Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) denial of the Eller Media’s applications to place six billboards in the city. Relators allege that the commissioner’s deputy (1) erred in concluding that the city’s public facilities zone was not a “business area” under Minn.Stat. § 173.08, subd. 1(8) (2000) by reading “business area” to refer to private business exclusively, rather than municipalities, and (2) erred in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Minnesota Power & L. Co. v. Personal Prop. Tax, Etc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- County of Washington v. City of Oak Park HeightsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re the Denial of Eller Media Company's Applications for Outdoor Advertising Device Permits in the City of Mounds ViewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003