Legal Opinion
Star Tribune Co. v. University of Minnesota Board of Regents
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 15, 2004No. A03-124, A03-155PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*278OPINION
RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.
In this case we must determine whether the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 13.01-90 (2002), and the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, Minn. Stat. §§ 13D.01-.07 (2002), apply to the Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota (Regents) in its process of selecting a new University President, and if so, whether such application violates the autonomy granted to the Regents by the Minnesota Constitution. The district court ruled that the Regents’ presidential search process was subject to those laws. The court of appeals agreed. We affirm.
In…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Regents of the University v. Employment Relations CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- No Power Line, Inc. v. Minnesota Environmental Quality CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Fedziuk v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. BarkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Isles Wellness, Inc. v. Progressive Northern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Ellis v. North Dakota State UniversityNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.