Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 2, 1975No. 1989PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Both defendants were convicted of robbery. Section 40A-16-2, N.M.S.A.1953 (2d Repl.Vol. 6, Supp.1973). Their appeals raise issues involving: (1) refusal of the trial court to allow alibi evidence; (2) continuing duty of disclosure; (3) cross-examination concerning juvenile offenses; and (4) refused instructions concerning evaluation of a witness’s testimony.
Refusal to Allow Alibi Evidence
Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(a) provides that upon written demand of the district attorney detailing the place, date and time of the crime charged a defendant who intends to offer…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Simos v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. TurnbowNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BoucinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Robert Harold FENDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert GOLDSMITH, and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- State v. MaiOregon Supreme Court · 1982
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.