Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1985No. 84-1146PublishedCited by 572 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The following three propositions of law are presented for our review.
“Proposition of Law No. I.
“Defense counsel’s failure to timely file a notice of alibi pursuant to Criminal Rule 12.1 does not per se constitute a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel.”
“Proposition of Law No. II.
“The exclusion of alibi testimony first offered by an accused after the close of the state’s case in violation of Criminal Rule 12.1 does not offend any right to testify or the Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process.”
*100“Proposition of Law No. III.
“A trial court does not abuse…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. LytleOhio Supreme Court · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by572 opinions
- State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. JamisonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. PostOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WoullardOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
567 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.