Legal Opinion

Wardius v. Oregon

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 11, 1973No. 71-6042PublishedCited by 794 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall

This ease involves important questions concerning the right of a defendant forced to comply with a “notice-of-alibi” rule to reciprocal discovery.

In Williams v. Florida, 399 U. S. 78 (1970), we upheld the constitutionality of Florida's notice-of-alibi rule which required criminal defendants intending to rely on an alibi defense to notify the prosecution of the place at which they claimed to be at the time in question, and of the names and addresses of witnesses they intended to call in support of the alibi.1 In so holding, however, we emphasized that the constitutionality of such rules might…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by794 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Gray v. NetherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

789 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API