Legal Opinion
State v. Lind
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 30, 1982No. Cr. 791, 792PublishedCited by 71 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Justice.
Raymond Carroll and Gregory Lind appealed from the respective judgments of conviction for the offense of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance and also appealed from the denial of their motions for acquittal [Rule 29, N.D.R.Crim.P.], for a new trial [Rule 33, N.D.R.Crim.P.], and for arrest of judgment [Rule 34, N.D.R.Crim. P.]. We affirm.
Carroll and Lind are two of four defendants who were charged with the offense of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance. The other two defendants, Harry Blevins and Michael Burstad, pleaded guilty to the same charge and the…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. IndvikNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- City of Fargo v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HatchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.