Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Simos v. Burke
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 20, 1968No. State 99PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The trial court refused to allow the defendant to testify that he was somewhere else at the time of the accident because no notice of alibi had been filed pursuant to sec. 955.07, Stats., providing as follows:
“Alibi to be pleaded. In courts of record, if the defendant intends to rely upon an alibi as a defense, he shall give to the district attorney written notice thereof on the day of arraignment, stating particularly the place where he claims to have been when the crime is alleged to have been committed together with the names and addresses of witnesses to his alibi, if known to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. StumpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Commonwealth v. VecchiolliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- State v. OvittSupreme Court of Vermont · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Luis Albert Alicea v. John R. Gagnon, Superintendent, and the Attorney General of WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- State v. BoucinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- People v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.