Robert Harold FENDLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert GOLDSMITH, and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
While on trial in Arizona state court, Robert Harold Fendler did not fully comply with the Arizona state criminal discovery rules. These rules permit extensive discovery in criminal cases, by both prosecution and defense, and provide sanctions for noncompliance. Because Fendler did not provide the prosecution with the addresses of two potential witnesses, as required by these rules, the state trial court prohibited those witnesses from testifying. On appeal from the district court’s denial of his habeas corpus petition, Fendler argues, principally, that the exclusion…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Anthony Lee Chaney v. Samuel Lewis, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and Lloyd E. Bramlett, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. NacchioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- City of Lakewood v. PapadelisOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1998
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.