Hinson v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This is an asbestosis case arising out of the alleged exposure of the plaintiff, Harry Hinson, to the defendants’ asbestos containing products. Bertha J. Hinson is a party to this action by virtue of her asserting a claim for loss of consortium. The matter is presently before the court upon the defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.Proc. Jurisdiction is based upon diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Plaintiffs 1 filed this action in state court on September 24, 1985, alleging that as a result of working with and around the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- William Radobenko and Mary G. Radobenko, His Wife, Individually and as Husband and Wife v. Automated Equipment Corporation, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Phoenix Savings and Loan, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of GodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Fisher v. PelstringDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Stokes v. Southeast Hotel Properties, Ltd.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1994
- Grillo v. Speedrite Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Flannery v. Singer Asset Finance Co., LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014