Legal Opinion

Grillo v. Speedrite Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 22, 2000No. 3168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Judge:

■ This personal injury action involves application of the statute of limitations to an alleged toxic exposure case. The circuit court granted summary judgment to Columbia Marking Products, Inc., concluding the three year statute of limitations barred Mark Grillo’s causes of action for negligence per se, strict liability, and negligent failure to warn. Grillo appeals. We reverse and remand.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Mark Grillo was employed by the Kroger Sav-On food store. As part of his duties, Grillo painted banners and signs for the store one day a week. Kroger purchased…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Matter of Ny County Des Litig.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Schiele v. Hobart Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fisher v. PelstringDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
  2. California v. Infineon Technologies AGDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  3. Murphy v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. KellyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  5. McAlhany v. CarterCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API