Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, Circuit Judge:
The plaintiff in this diversity action appeals the order of the district court granting summary judgment to the defendants in this action alleging personal injuries due to exposure to asbestos-containing products mined, manufactured and/or sold by defendants. Plaintiff contends that there are genuine issues of material fact as to plaintiff’s exposure to defendant’s products during the ten year period provided under North Carolina General Statute 1-15(b). 1
Appellant also claims that this North Carolina statute is unconstitutional because it violates the equal protection…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by648 opinions
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Beale v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- James H. Spriggs v. Diamond Auto Glass Richard A. Rutta Ernest StickellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- William L. Tippens, Deceased, Nell P. Tippens, Individually and as Widow of William L. Tippens v. The Celotex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
643 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.