Legal Opinion
Chang v. Department of the Navy
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 22, 2004No. CIV.A.00-0783(PLF)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment and plaintiffs motion for leave to conduct discovery. In this action, plaintiff claims that defendant, the Department of the Navy, violated the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, when the Navy released information about plaintiff, Commander Daniel W. Chang, to the media and to individual members of Congress. Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments and the entire record, the Court grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denies plaintiffs motion for leave to conduct…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Mulhern v. GatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Krieger v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Lewis v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- New Orleans Workers' Ctr. for Racial Justice v. U.S. Immigration & Customs EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Durrani v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.