Legal Opinion
Mulhern v. Gates
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 4, 2007No. Civil Action 05-2036 (PLF)PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2 Plaintiff alleges that his former employer, the National Reconnaissance Office, an agency within the Department of Defense, disclosed information about him without his consent and failed to provide access to records upon request in violation of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a et seq. Upon consideration of the motion, the opposition, the reply, and the entire record in this case, the Court will grant…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Barouch v. U.S. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Bonieskie v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Doe v. United States Department of the TreasuryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Doe v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Krieger v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.