Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Short v. Hinkle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1921No. 16353PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Application filed in the supréme court February 14, 1921, for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to receive and file a proposal for the referendum of the administrative code.

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus to compel the secretary of state to receive and file the proposal and affidavits of the relators for the referendum of Laws of 1921, ch. 7, p. 12, being an act entitled “An Act relating to, and to promote efficiency, order and economy in, the administration of the government of the state, prescribing the powers and duties of certain officers and departments, defining offenses and fixing penalties, abolishing certain offices, and repealing conflicting acts and parts of acts,” and commonly known as the administrative code.

Chapter 7 consists of 138…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. PitneyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State ex rel. Case v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State ex rel. State Reclamation Board v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1920

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Davis v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Reiter v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State ex rel. Wegner v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API