Legal Opinion

State ex rel. State Reclamation Board v. Clausen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1920No. 15620PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court November 4, 1919, for a writ of mandamus to compel the state auditor to issue a warrant to relator in payment for land purchased by the state reclamation board under the land settlement act.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an original mandamus proceeding in this court, wherein the relators seek a writ of mandate to compel the state auditor to issue a warrant against the state reclamation revolving fund to the relator, George J. Hurley, in payment for 160 acres of land purchased from him by the state reclamation board under the land settlement act, Laws of 1919, ch. 188, page 583. The auditor has refused to issue the warrant as demanded of him, basing his refusal upon the sole ground that the land settlement act is unconstitutional.

To the end that we have clearly before us the full purpose and scope of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis-Smith Co. v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Lowell v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  3. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  4. Jones v. City of PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Olcott v. SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Belovsky v. Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Aetna Life Insurance v. Washington Life & Disability Insurance Guaranty Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Dickinson v. PorterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Banker v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1927

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API