Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Case v. Howell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1915No. 12719PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court March 29, 1915, for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to file an act proposed for submission to a referendum vote.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the secretary of state to file five copies of ' *283an act of the recent legislature, called the Renick bill, together with the affidavit as provided by law relating to the referendum.

The respondent seeks to justify his refusal to file these papers on the single ground that the bill.went into effect on its approval by the governor on February 26, 1915, by reason of the declaration in the act that it is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and safety, and shall take effect immediately. The relator…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. CLEAN v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. State ex rel. Goodman v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  5. State Ex Rel. Reiter v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1931

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API