Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Reiter v. Hinkle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1931No. 23112. En BancPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Relator, a resident of King county and a qualified voter therein, desiring to procure, by petition, in accordance with the provisions of amendment No. YII to the state constitution and the statutes passed pursuant thereto, a referendum on chapter 23 of Laws of 1931, p. 77, entitled:

“An Act relating to revenue and taxation, requiring distributors as therein defined to pay an excise tax 'on the sale of all butter substitutes, providing for licensing dealers therein, fixing a penalty for a violation of the provisions of the act, and declaring that this act shall take effect immediately, ’ ’

approv…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Case v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Short v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. State ex rel. Anderson v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. State Ex Rel. Hoppe v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Farris v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hunt v. NortonArizona Supreme Court · 1948

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API