Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Reiter v. Hinkle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 1931No. 23112. En BancPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Relator, a resident of King county and a qualified voter therein, desiring to procure, by petition, in accordance with the provisions of amendment No. YII to the state constitution and the statutes passed pursuant thereto, a referendum on chapter 23 of Laws of 1931, p. 77, entitled:
“An Act relating to revenue and taxation, requiring distributors as therein defined to pay an excise tax 'on the sale of all butter substitutes, providing for licensing dealers therein, fixing a penalty for a violation of the provisions of the act, and declaring that this act shall take effect immediately, ’ ’
approv…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Case v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- State ex rel. Short v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- State ex rel. Anderson v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Hamilton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Hoppe v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Farris v. MunroWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Hunt v. NortonArizona Supreme Court · 1948
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.