Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Blakeslee v. Clausen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1915No. Nos. 12730, 12732, 12737PublishedCited by 84 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court April 1, 1915, for a writ of mandamus to compel the state auditor to issue warrants for material and supplies furnished certain state departments.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

These cases depend upon the answer to the question whether items in appropriation bills, in so far as they affect the claims of the relators, are subject to the referendum under the seventh amendment to the constitution of this state.

*262The claim of the relator Blakeslee is for materials furnished to the highway department of the state of Washington. The claim of the relator Schwabacher Brothers & Company is for food for young salmon hatched at the state fish hatcheries and bought by the fisheries department of the state of Washington. The claim of the relator Martin is for supplies furnished to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Aldridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  4. State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. People ex rel. Bay City v. State TreasurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Flanders v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Johnson v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  4. Citizens for Financially Responsible Government v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Hoppe v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1961

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API