Legal Opinion
East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Railroad Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1924No. S. F. No. 11174PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent Railroad Commission to fix and determine the just compensation to be paid by petitioner for the lands, properties, and rights of the East Bay Water Company in contemplation of an eminent domain or other appropriate proceeding. The matter is submitted on a general demurrer to the petition. There is therefore no controversy as to the facts.
It appears that the petitioner is a municipal utility district organized under and pursuant to an act of the legislature approved May 23, 1921 (Stats. 1921, p. 245); that the district…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500California Supreme Court · 1917
- City of S. Pasadena v. Pasadena Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- County of Marin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Pratt v. Coast Trucking, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Los Angeles Railway Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.