Gray v. Reclamation District No. 1500
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sutter County. Emmet Seawell, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
Above the confluence of Feather River with Sacramento River lies a vast Y-shaped tract of land. Much of this land is swamp and overflowed land of the char-: acter contemplated by the Arkansas Act, and title to it passed to the state of California by virtue of that act. Defendant Reclamation District No. 1500, organized for the purpose of reclaiming the portion of this land within its boundaries, was proceeding with the work of levee construction when, at the instance of these plaintiffs, who for general purposes may be described as owners of land within the same triangle, lying to the north…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.