Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Railway Corp. v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1940No. L. A. 17460PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The City of Los Angeles adopted an initiative ordinance requiring crews of at least two persons on all street cars in the City of Los Angeles. The Los Angeles Bail way Corporation, pursuant to an order of the Bailroad Commission granting it permission so to do, had theretofore purchased new specified equipment and converted and standardized its existing equipment for the operation of one-man street cars, and had been so operating them. It filed an action against the city by which it sought to have the ordinance declared unconstitutional and void and the officers of the defendant…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  4. In Re MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Gadd v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Rivera v. City of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Mervynne v. AckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Holder v. Key SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Jensen v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API