Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Railroad Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1939No. S. F. 15980PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

Pursuant to the provisions contained in Statutes 1935, page 878, as amended, in a proceeding which theretofore had been initiated by the respondent commission, an order was made by it by which minimum rates or charges for the transportation of various commodities by different types of highway common carriers, respectively, were fixed and determined. Thereafter, Southern Pacific Company, which was and is a common carrier by rail, that was relatively affected by such order, together with several other like carriers, filed with the respondent commission certain schedules or rates, wherein and…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. St. Joseph Stock Yards Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Hough v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Webster v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. California Motor Transport Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API